本論文已被瀏覽 40 次， [ ] 25 次，[ ] [ ]
「虛」與「實」或野i以解釋成不存在與存在或是看似不存在與實在，在任何的定義下，偏向虛的一方和實的一方的客體現象是什麼？虛幻雖是假象但是事實上又並不等於空無，虛象也可以利用形式的作法去表達出來，這樣便是一種轉化過程。虛象與形式雖然各有獨特的現象，但是虛實卻相同的具有一定的目的性，若只有幻想終究沒辦法實現，在感受力洞察的結果呈現於概念上，其實就是邁入實現目的的方法之一。在虛的客體上，藝術哲學家蘇珊．郎格（Susanne K﹒Langer）認為這是靠記憶所解釋出來的虛象，在實的客體上，英國哲學家哈奇森（Francis Hutcheson）認為這是在於形式的品質。虛與實在理論下的解釋成為客體的虛象與形式，這也只能代表著一種經驗而已，但是形式與虛象必須透過再轉化的過程才能使之平衡與客觀，這也就是本研究所要探討與操作的目的。
In terms of designing creation, no matter what kind of designing creation it is, observation is the initial step. The information transmitted to human s brains through the coherence of visual, tactile, acoustic or gustatory perceptions would be translated by thinking and engender inspiration and mindset. The scope of observation is very comprehensive. Everyone has the same observational purpose to perceive what things would be felt like, or it is only a dream. But what the result yielded by perception would be? There is no bound rule for the same behavior, and that s where creation initiates.
Vacuous-ness and substantiality might be explained as nonexistence & existence or something seemed not to exist & substantiate. No matter under what kind of definition, what are the objective phenomena of the one who tends to vacuous-ness and the one who tends to substantiality? Vacuous-ness is a false appearance, but actually it is not equal to empty since virtual image could also be expressed by form which is alleged transformational process. Though there are distinct phenomena both in virtual image and form, they have some same purpose. If there is only fantasy, nothing would be come true. While the results penetrated by perception are presented in concepts, it is actually one of the ways to step into fulfill the purpose. As to the object of vacuous-ness, arts philosopher Susanne K. Langer argues that it is a virtual image expounded by way of relying on memories. With regard to the object of substantiality, English philosopher Francis Hutcheson suggests that it depends on the quality of form. Under theoretic explanation, the vacuous-ness and substantiality become the object s virtual image and form, which represents only a kind of experience. But the form and virtual image must take on the transformational process so as to reach balance and objectivity that is what the purpose the study would explore and operate.
Therefore, as to the literature review, the study would mainly search for the definitions and theories of form and virtual image from scholars in the artistic domains and contrast such definitions and theories with those from other philosophers so as to quest for the points that might integrate the form and virtual image, then, implement to conceptual thinking in the end.
In regard to the exploration of case analysis, the study would mainly list three architects mindsets and proceedings while they operate concepts and prosecute the architecture as the approaches of the literature review which explore who is prone to form operation, who tends to virtual image operation, and who is getting between the two sides, it could also illustrate the common traits of operational concepts among the artists and architects. As to the last practical operation, the study uses methods of observation, fantasy and experience to perceive some things around the operational site of default concepts so as to explore the characteristics and common points of form and virtual image, too.
In the end, while getting into conceptual designing, what new findings would be got in practically operating the form and virtual image by way of abovementioned methods, it would be the issue confronted by the study and what the author wants to explore.